Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘botany’ Category

Image courtesy of Kathleen Garness. All rights reserved

Image courtesy of Kathleen Garness. All rights reserved

This week we have the good fortune to learn from Kathleen Garness, a scientific illustrator in Illinois whose botanical illustrations are being used to encourage an interest in native plants in the Chicago area. Kathleen has graciously stopped by to discuss her current projects.


    ArtPlantae
    : How did you become involved in the Chicago plant families project?

    Kathleen: I have become passionate about the need for natural areas restoration since joining the Chicago Botanic Garden’s Plants of Concern rare plant monitoring program in 2001. Plants of Concern (POC) uses a nationally-acclaimed systematic scientific protocol that records data about the species, its associates, threats to the population and land management history. Right now I am responsible for monitoring about 40 populations of 26 rare species at ten different sites in four counties in our region, reporting our findings to the Chicago Botanic Garden and the landowners.

    Why? Our rare, and even common, native species are being crowded out by non-native shrubs such as European buckthorn and herbaceous plants such as garlic mustard and teasel. Because of this, we are losing our valuable pollinators, and if we allow this trend to continue it will have disastrous economic and nutritional impacts on our well being, not to mention the tragic loss of so much of our botanical natural heritage.

    Several years ago I had been asked to consider “adopting” one of my monitoring sites, Grainger Woods, since it did not have a steward, and they hoped that restoration efforts would be able to keep it nearly pristine. Two years ago we achieved the highest level of natural areas protection afforded by the state. Now, over half of the site is an Illinois dedicated nature preserve. Grainger Woods has over 300 species of plants and is an important bird study area for Lake County IL, because the rare red-headed woodpecker has been known to nest there. One Saturday morning every month, in addition to our POC work (which may involve one or more extensive surveys per season per species and site) we clear the area of invasive non-native trees, shrubs or herbaceous plants.

    While the Chicago region is arguably the nation’s leader in natural areas restoration, our biennial Wild Things conference draws well over a thousand attendees from the region. Many volunteers lack a depth of botanical knowledge that, a hundred years ago, used to be an essential part of every high school curriculum. But now, this knowledge is in danger of being lost entirely. And many site managers and stewards don’t have the time to train their volunteers about the finer points of plant taxonomy, even if they felt it would be valuable. So one of the region’s leaders, Barbara Birmingham, a retired science teacher, has been trying to address that deficit by offering monthly field botany classes at her site every year for the past three years. She asked me to assist her in developing new materials, and since each month she focused on a different common plant family, and would be using these materials in coming years, I felt this was a worthwhile use of my skills and time.

    As the project evolved, we realized this could be useful region-wide, so I enlisted the help of many local scientists and stewards, emailing them the pages for their comments, according to their area of specialty. Chicago Botanic Garden’s Plant Conservation Manager of Regional Floristics, Susanne Masi, who co-authored The Sunflower Family in the Upper Midwest, edited the Asteraceae pages; Stephen Packard, director of Audubon Chicago Region and Kenneth Robertson from the Illinois Natural History Survey, contributed to the Rosaceae; and many others contributed to the rest of the series. John Balaban, one of the original Cook County North Branch stewards, and Rebecca Collings provided dedicated support from the Field Museum of Natural History here in Chicago. We are more than halfway through the project, having completed fourteen of the twenty-six most common plant families here. (Rebecca and I first become acquainted when I was asked by their botanist Bil Alverson to assist with Keys to Nature Orchids.

    The Field Museum provided the template, which was consistent with the other Rapid Color Guides they had already developed. We worked together as a team to come up with the design and content for each page, which I wrote and illustrated. We chose species that restoration volunteers might easily come across, as well as a few that are invasive or of special concern, to watch out for and report. Since we have so much biodiversity in our region, it was hard to choose, and for that I was very grateful for the team approach. Some of the families, such as the gentians and arums, were able to be completed in one page — the others were just an overview. We also wanted to suggest some of the important ecological relationships plants have to animals and used Milkweed Metropolis as that one example.


    ArtPlantae
    : What are the goals of this project? How do the project sponsors – The Field Museum – plan to use this information?

    Kathleen: We will be promoting the pages next February during the
    Wild Things Conference at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The Field Museum will be giving their ecology students the pages as handouts this next field season, and providing the link to the pages so that folks can also access them via mobile technology such as smartphones or digital tablets. Stewards will be able to use them as handouts in their field botany walks and restoration instructions, too.

    And I feel a clarification is in order here – by no means are they intended to replace field guides or taxonomic keys. Rather, they are a quick visual way for folks new to natural areas exploration or restoration to begin to familiarize themselves with botany basics, not feel so intimidated by the diversity our area offers, and maybe eventually purchase a field guide such as Peterson’s or Newcomb’s. So they are intended to complement the use of field guides, providing a quick visual identification to family; from there an unknown plant can hopefully be keyed to species using a field guide or an online resource such as the USDA PLANTS Database or Flora of North America. The page set also includes a short glossary.


    ArtPlantae
    : Do you envision other uses for this guide?

    Kathleen: We have shown them to regional scouting program leaders and

    Image courtesy of Kathleen Garness. All rights reserved

    Image courtesy of Kathleen Garness. All rights reserved

    high school science teachers, and some teachers are providing them to their classes for extra credit work. We would be thrilled to offer them to Mighty Acorns, a junior naturalist program sponsored by the Cook County Forest Preserve. Recently, the American Society of Botanical Artists graciously awarded me the Anne Ophelia Dowden grant for 2013, with which I will be able to offer art classes and distribute sets of materials, including these plant family pages, to five regional community centers, as outreach to underserved populations. These pages have sort of taken on a life of their own, now!


    ArtPlantae
    : You have mentioned in the past that there needs to be a grassroots effort to help people “make the connection between plants and well-being.” From what you’ve observed through your work with the public, where would be a good place to start?

    Kathleen: Well, we’re hoping these materials will begin to assist with this! For the last twenty years or so, there has been a groundswell of interest in natural areas restoration, organic gardening, urban horticulture, even beekeeping, not just regionally or nationally, but worldwide. Well before this, the Midwest was blessed with being the epicenter of the ecology movement, through the pioneering work of famous naturalist Robert Kennicott, who worked for the Smithsonian Institution and was a founder of the Chicago Academy of Sciences; Stephen Forbes, who was the first head of the Illinois Natural History Survey; Henry Chandler Cowles, University of Chicago, today considered the father of ‘dynamic ecology’; Aldo Leopold; and the tireless May Theilgaard Watts, who was one of Morton Arboretum’s most famous naturalists. These intrepid naturalists got out into the field every day, marveled at the wonders of nature, made careful observations, and inspired several generations that followed. So this generation, I feel, is standing on the shoulders of giants, and we need to keep the momentum going – we need to get folks outside, to have them experience the beauty of nature firsthand on a regular basis, but also provide them the tools to really SEE and appreciate what they are looking at. That is the goal of my current botanical illustration work and I see no proper end to it. I hope artists and naturalists in other regions see the value in this and do it for their communities too.


    ArtPlantae
    : You are working on another project in which economic botany and ornamental horticulture are the focus. What are the educational objectives of this project?

    Kathleen: The Oak Park Conservatory, where I am Artist-in-Residence until November 2013, has also engaged me to make similar materials about the plants in their tropical greenhouses. So far I have completed two sets – cacao and poinsettias – of the eight sets commissioned, and am now starting on the cacti and succulents. These are not family pages per se because each set’s scope is broader than just one family. I also interact with the Conservatory visitors, show them how a botanical artist works, chat about the various collections if they’re interested, and will hopefully complete my tenure there with an exhibit of new watercolors!


    ArtPlantae
    : You are doing wonderful work, Kathleen. Thank you for spending time with us this week.


More About the Field Guide

The pages of Common Plant Families of the Chicago Region are standard 8.5″ x 11″ pages and fit easily into a 3-ring binder. Since they are a standard size, the pages are also easy to laminate. Users of this guide may be interested in creating their own color-coding system while learning the features of each plant family (similar to what is used in Botany Illustrated).

Featured in this guide are the following plant families:

  • Apiaceae (Parsley Family)
  • Araceae (Arum Family)
  • Asclepiadaceae (Milkweed Family)
  • Asteraceae (Sunflower Family)
  • Brassicaceae (Mustard Family)
  • Fabaceae (Legume Family)
  • Gentianaceae (Gentian Family)
  • Lamiaceae (Mint Family)
  • Liliaceae (Lily Family)
  • Onagraceae (Evening Primrose Family)
  • Orchidaceae (Orchid Family)
  • Ranunculaceae (Buttercup Family)
  • Rosaceae (Rose Family)
  • Scrophulariaceae (Snapdragon Family)

A glossary of botanical terms is also included with the guide.

The guide Common Plant Families of the Chicago Region is available online for free.



About Kathleen Garness

The botanical/scientific illustration certificate program at Morton Arboretum was the turning point for me. While I had painted watercolors of tropical orchids for many years previous, the classes at Morton refined my pen and ink skills and fueled an interest in learning about and documenting local native species.

I really enjoy my work as a volunteer natural areas steward for Grainger Woods. My two passions – preserving habitat and documenting native species – seem to feed off each other. In 2008 my colleague Pat Hayes and I were surprised with a Chicago Wilderness Grassroots Conservation Leadership Award for our work in developing educational materials for youth as part of the national Leave No Child Inside initiative.

What feels like an eon ago, I served as board member and president of the historic Palette and Chisel Academy of Fine Arts in Chicago, and am still currently active in several local and national arts organizations. One of my most exciting opportunities, though, was the acceptance of one of my paintings into the Shirley Sherwood Gallery, Kew Gardens, London, as part of Losing Paradise? Endangered Plants Here and Around the World and in the 2011 edition of Smithsonian in Your Classroom.

I am the mother of one son, Ian Halliday, who encouraged me in this work by buying me a Wacom tablet one year for Christmas when he saw me laboring over my other avocation, the illustrations for the Little Gospels, published by Liturgy Training Publications for the Catechesis of the Good Shepherd curriculum. I still have to figure out how the Master’s in Religious Education and 20+ years teaching Sunday school figures into the artist side of me, but it all seems to fit somehow!



Additional Information About Plants of the Chicago Region

Read Full Post »

It may be winter, but there is no need to wait for Spring to integrate plants and art in the classroom. All one needs to do is follow the example set by biology teacher Pat Stellflue, art teacher Marie Allen and botany professor D. Timothy Gerber. In their paper Art & Science Grow Together, they explain how they created a project that placed plants and botanical illustration high on the agenda for an entire school year.

In a program they call “Plants, Pots and Paints”, Stellflue et al. (2005) integrated the plant sciences with the arts in their work with fourth and fifth grade students. On the science side, their program addressed plant structure and function, growth stages, survival strategies and reproductive strategies. On the art side, their program focused on different media and art techniques. Key to this program was a pottery project (clay pot construction) and drawing (botanical illustration). The disciplines of botany and art came together in a series of hands-on activities in which growing, drawing, painting and dissecting (Stellflue et al., 2005) were the focus.

Using tulips, crocus, iris and daffodils as their primary study subjects, students learned about growth stages, form, function and drawing while planting and growing spring flowers and illustrating their observations.

After a full year of integrating botany and botanical art, Stellflue et al. (2005) observed that students ended the year with stronger observation skills and an enhanced understanding of plants. This became clear to the authors through the increasingly informative illustrations students created (Stellflue et al., 2005). The authors also observed students taking better care of their plants because they had built the clay pots and drainage trays themselves.

Art & Science Grow Together is available online and can be purchased for 99¢.


Literature Cited

Stellflue, Pat and Marie Allen, D. Timothy Gerber. 2005. Art and science grow together. Science & Children. 43(1): 33-35



Related Information

Resources about bulbs, seeds, plants and schoolyard gardens at ArtPlantae Books

Read Full Post »

Looking ahead to the new year, here is the latest update for
Classes Near You > Oregon:


Quinn Fitzpatrick

www.quinnfitzpatrick.com
Quinn is an artist, a musician, and a graduate of the Natural Science Illustration Program at the University of Washington. His specialties include wild cats, raptors, wild edible plants, and medicinal plants. His chosen media are graphite, watercolor, gouache, colored pencil, and photography.

    Botanical Illustration: Introduction
    Saturday, March 9, 2013
    1:00 – 4:50 PM
    Natural science illustrator Quinn E. Fitzpatrick introduces students to botanical illustration and field identification techniques at Portland Community College. Cost: $35. View Details/Register

Read Full Post »

In the second part of his series about the history of botany education in America, professor Marshall D. Sundberg takes a look at how botany textbooks, classroom instruction and student learning evolved in the 19th century. Part Two in this series focuses on textbook authors, teachers and America’s first professional botanists.

Botany textbooks were big business in the 1800s as educators, botanists and botany enthusiasts strived to carry out two things: 1) Teach botany to the public, and 2) Turn botany into a professional discipline.

The author of the first bestselling botany book in the U.S. was the female “botanophile” (i.e., botany enthusiast), Almira Hart Lincoln Phelps (Sundberg, 2012). Phelps taught botany at a seminary and it is her experiences as a teacher that made her realize the need for a botany book for beginners. So she wrote a book based upon her lecture notes and published Familiar Lectures on Botany: Including practical and elementary botany with generic and specific descriptions of the most common native and foreign plants and a vocabulary of botanical terms for the use of higher schools and academies (1929). Phelps, who became the second woman elected to the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1859 (Sundberg, 2012), had some competition in the textbook market. Competitors included her teacher Amos Eaton, Alphonso Wood (a popular author of taxonomy textbooks for all grade levels), and America’s first professional botanist, Asa Gray (Sundberg, 2012). Between them they published several textbooks for elementary schools, secondary schools and universities.

The growth of botany programs in the U.S. increased as the number of colleges and universities increased (Sundberg, 2012). Many firsts occurred during this period of growth. For example, in 1847 Asa Gray taught the first one-month intensive botany class that would become the precursor to upper division botany labs and graduate programs (Sundberg, 2012). In 1871, Gray taught the first summer workshops in botany for U.S. high school teachers (Sundberg, 2012). At Iowa Agricultural College professor Charles E. Bessey started the first botany lab for undergrads in America in 1873 and, one year later, introduced students at the University of California to laboratory methods in botany (Sundberg, 2012).

Today we take for granted the availability of journal articles about all aspects of teaching and learning in biology. There was a time, however, when they didn’t exist. This changed in 1880 when Bessey’s graduate student, J.C. Arthur, wrote the first teaching paper in a botanical journal (Sundberg, 2012). What was his article about? It was about how the stem of a pumpkin is a good laboratory example of a dicot stem (Sundberg, 2012). Two years later, Bessey wrote an article suggesting teachers use Asparagus stems as their laboratory example of a monocot stem (Sundberg, 2012).

As for teaching methods in botany, this was a new topic area too. William J. Beal described his approach to teaching botany in an article published in the Botanical Gazette a journal serving, as Sundberg (2012) describes it, as “the mouthpiece of the younger generation of botanists”. Beal’s pedagogical approach to teaching botany emphasized observation and the recording of written and visual descriptions (Sundberg, 2012).

And let’s not forget the first textbook about plant dissection. Written by J.C. Arthur, the Handbook of Plant Dissection was published in 1886 and in addition to all that you’d expect to find in a dissection manual, includes commentary about the value of drawing what one observes in lab.

Sundberg’s article about the development of botany education in this country sheds light on the origins of the different philosophies within the discipline, as well as different philosophies in biology education. Take for example, the 19th century conversation surrounding the value of biology education over botany and zoology education. Sundberg’s discussion of opposing philosophies brought back memories of grad school and the tensions within the biology department where I went to school. Back then there was much conversation about the development of a new curriculum that would change how botany and zoology classes would be taught. It was the “cell squishers” against the “lizard chasers” — this is how grad students saw it, anyway. One day a faculty member on the cell and molecular side used the word “archaic” to describe the department’s curriculum. Folks on the organismic side had their own opinions. It was interesting to read that riffs such as this one go back to the 1800s.

Sundberg’s series about the history of botany education is very interesting and I encourage you to read Part One and Part Two.

Some of the references Sundberg refers to throughout his article are available online. Below are links to two of the books. Enjoy!

    Gray, Asa. 1858.How Plants Grow: A simple introduction to to structural botany with a popular flora or a description and arrangement of common plants both wild and cultivated. New York: American Book Company.
    View online

    Henslow, Reverand Professor. 1858. Illustrations to be employed impractical lessons on botany. Adapted to beginners of all classes. Prepared for the South Kensignton Museum. London: Chapman and Hall. View online



Literature Cited

Sundberg, Marshall D. 2012. Botanical education in the United States: Part 2, The nineteenth century – Botany for the masses vs. the professionalization of botany. Plant Science Bulletin. 58(3): 101-131. Fall 2012. Web.
<http://issuu.com/botanicalsocietyofamerica/docs/psbseptember_-_58__3__2012> [accessed 13 September 2012]

Read Full Post »

Our conversation with book artist, Shawn Sheehy continues…


ArtPlantae
: You created a pop-up field guide of North American wildflowers highlighting twelve genera and twelve plant families. Where did the idea for a field guide originate? Why did you decide upon these specific plants for the field guide?

Shawn: I first developed these studies as content for my wildflowers workshop, which I launched in the interest of reaching workshop populations outside of the book arts community. Several months later I bound them together into the field guide–and thought it would be fun (and add literary value) to add additional context to the blooms by writing and including the essay on the “Language of Flowers.”


Read More

Read Full Post »

The Eden Project
www.edenproject.com
Located in Cornwall, England, the Eden Project is a non-profit whose focus is connecting people to the natural world through educational programs, social programs, music and art. See how the Eden Project was transformed from a clay pit to an international institute for learning.

    Botanical Illustration – October 5-7, 2012; 10 AM – 4 PM. A three-day class about botany and botanical illustration. On Day One, participants will learn about plants, their structures and their functions. On Day Two and Day Three, botanical artists Mally Francis and Ros Franklin will teach botanical drawing using fruit and the autumn harvest as their themes. Open to beginners and more experienced students. Cost: £180, includes entry to the Eden Project, lunch and refreshments. View Details/Register

This information can also be viewed at Classes Near You > England.



Related

Mally Francis Paints the Lost Gardens of Heligan

Read Full Post »

Drawing is not about making pictures, but it is about learning to see through drawing.

— Ila Crawford

In Art Instruction in Botany Lab, Lyn Baldwin and Ila Crawford investigated how drawing changed the way botany students learned in a traditional botany lab. This year, they are investigating the reverse — how students in a traditional art class will react to the study of botany.

In a recent article, Does the Science of Botany Need Art? Does Art Need the Science of Botany?, Baldwin and Crawford write about how the disciplines of art and botany can benefit from each other. To make their points, Baldwin (a quantitative field botanist) explains why “the science of botany needs the joy of art” and Crawford (a visual art instructor with 20 years experience) explains the reasons why plants have a “legitimate place in art education.” Their article is a must-read if you’re interested in how drawing can be used to encourage an interest in plants.

Written as a backdrop for their current research about incorporating botany into art class, it also serves as an announcement for an exciting new exhibition for which Baldwin and Crawford are the curators. The exhibition they have created explores the idea that “art inhabits the teaching and practice of botany, and conversely botanical subjects and scientific methods have a legitimate place in teaching and practicing art.”

Lyn Baldwin and Ila Crawford have announced the call for entries for this exhibition and they would like to invite you to participate. The wonderful thing about this exhbition is that it is open to not only artists, but to botanists as well!

Here is a summary:

Art and Science: Drawing and Botany
Canadian Botanical Association
June 5-25, 2013

Invited: Artists, botanists, and groups of artists and botanists working on special projects (10 or more individuals)

Submissions: Three maximum for individuals; one per member for group submissions. Only original work will be accepted, no reproductions. Sketchbooks will be accepted. Only digital images will be accepted for the jurying process.

Entry Fee: $10 per registration ($10 covers up to three works)

Deadlines: Individual submissions (March 29, 2013), Project-based submissions (January 15, 2013)

For additional information about digital submissions, artist’s statements, insurance and more, visit Art and Science: Drawing and Botany.



Literature Cited

Baldwin, Lyn and Ila Crawford. 2012. Does the science of botany need art? Does art need the science of botany? Canadian Botanical Association / L’Association Botanique du Canada. CBA/ABC Bulletin. 45(1): 10-13. Web. http://www.tru.ca/cba-abc/art.html [accessed 16 August 2012]

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »