• Home
  • About

ArtPlantae Today

Connecting artists, naturalists, and educators

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Community Gatherings Celebrate Plants, Art & Creativity
ArtPlantae Books Moves to New Platform »

How can we experience plants differently?

March 8, 2013 by Tania Marien

How can we help children experience plants differently before we teach them that they are insignificant?

This heavy question is rooted in the sobering reality that adults teach children how to think about plants and how to treat them.

In Where did you go? The forest. What did you see? Nothing., Lynda H. Schneekloth discusses how adults send conflicting messages about plants to children and how the dominant message to children is that vegetation can be categorized as “nothing” (Schneekloth, 1989). Examples of conflicting messages adults send to children are “vegetables are good for you, eat them…we need to build something here, bulldoze the trees” (Schneekloth, 1989).

How did vegetation become so invisible?

Schneekloth (1989) presents three factors contributing to the unfortunate status of plants in our society. She explains that plants make up too much of the background. Because there are so many plants, they have suffered the fate of any element, when in abundance, that forms a background. Because they are the background, plants make what is different appear to be more important (Schneekloth, 1989).

Also contributing to the problem of visibility is how people experience plants in their real lives compared to what we know about them at the scientific level. Regardless of how we’ve come to know plants scientifically, in our real lives plants exist only to serve us (Schneekloth, 1989). This reality contributes directly to the the third issue making plants invisible and this issue is, it’s all about us.

Because we have come to know plants so well through research, Schneekloth (1989) says this has created a feeling of superiority that prevents us from seeing the extent to which we are dependent upon plants. She explains that our ability to make plants grow and appear in ways that suit us has created a “false sense of security” (Schneekloth, 1989) and has left us feeling in control of our world.

With plants existing only in the background and with our anthropormorphic view of the world, how are plants perceived by humans?

Schneekloth investigated this by asking two groups of people (environmental educators and grad students studying architecture) to draw a picture of “an experience, place or activity” (Schneekloth, 1989) that was key to their forming a relationship with nature. The details of her study can be reviewed in her paper. The big takeaway from her investigation is this — when people drew their nature experience, they placed humans in a scene with vegetation; when they talked about their experience, the actions taken by humans was the focus. Schneekloth (1989) observed that drawing gave plants a presence, while language rendered plants invisible. She observed that in a drawing, plants are “something” (Schneekloth, 1989) because they are given form.

There is much more to learn from Schneekloth in her article about the value of vegetation. Look for the journal Children’s Environments Quarterly at your local college library.

So let’s get back to that big question…

    How can we help children experience plants differently before we teach them that they are insignificant?

Share your thoughts in the comment box below.


Literature Cited

Schneekloth, Lynda H. 1989. Where did you go? The forest. What did you see? Nothing. Children’s Environments Quarterly. 6(1):14-17



Related

Children’s books cited by Schneekloth that give plants a foreground presence:

  • The Little Prince by Antoine de Saint-Exupery, translated by Richard Howard (2000)
  • The Return of the King by J.R.R. Tolkein (1965)
  • A Wind in the Door by Madelaine L’Engle (1973)

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in drawing, Teaching & Learning, teaching and learning | 9 Comments

9 Responses

  1. on March 8, 2013 at 10:49 AM Kathleen Garness

    Depending on the age of the child, we connect the children to growing food plants and/or flowers. In the late fall we look for amaryllis bulbs for the kids to grow and observe. We also talk about the connections between pollinators and plants being a vital part of the food we eat. When they develop a relationship of care for a plant, they start to look at them differently.


  2. on March 8, 2013 at 1:20 PM Rita Hopper

    Me thinketh it is one’s background that give the back ground on how a child and eventually adults think about plants. LIke I grew up with an agricultural back ground so we protected the plants except for the weeds – so I have ended up being a botanical artist. Also, your parents play a big role in how you relate to plants – I had a father who loved them and knew the names of all he saw – which was an eye opener to me and has stuck with me.


    • on March 8, 2013 at 2:26 PM ArtPlantae Today

      Good point, Rita. I grew up with bonsai, orchids, plums, apricots and lots of plants in the yard. Plus a very large stump to a very large eucalyptus tree that had to be cut down. It was something to climb, although in reality it was only a couple of steps up. But it was something to sit on and it made you really dirty.


  3. on March 13, 2013 at 12:20 PM Cate

    I am a plant physiologist turned educator and, as such, I have a number of opinions on this: 1) most teachers do not have a full understanding of plants and how they work and so when they teach about plants, they gloss over them; we need to provide classroom teachers with some interesting ideas for how to teach kids about plants- most easily- have them grow things! It is cheap and easy 2) I agree with Rita. I was outside always; our students should be too- tasking students with finding and labeling plants is the best way to get them to ‘see’ them. Our learning needs to appeal to all the senses- the study mentioned above is interesting because if you ask a child what they hear outside or smell outside- plants! 3) We cant live without plants- I think that needs to be hammered home. No way around it. Oxygen, Food, Shelter… 4) Plants are cool- we need to share those things with students- Venus Fly traps, Resurrection plants 5) Catch them young- I used to go in to the local kindergarten and do the experiment with potato seedlings and light- the fact that they are phototropic, so they will grow through mazes, etc. Hm. Now that I look at it- I guess it all goes back to 1 & 2. Thanks for bringing up the topic.


    • on March 13, 2013 at 12:52 PM ArtPlantae Today

      Thank you, Cate, for sharing your experiences and for your comments. Much appreciated.


  4. on March 13, 2013 at 2:08 PM Martin

    Where I work we’ve had the problem of how to get children to see plants better too.

    I drew some leaf outlines as line drawings on cards and then stood in a meadow with a class of schoolchildren, handed them each a card, and then asked them to find a plant with the same shaped leaf. (I should add here that there was a path through the meadow and they weren’t allowed to leave the path). When they thought they had found it they had to put their hand up and ask me to check whether they were correct. They loved it because it was like a treasure hunt and they got lots of praise when they got it right. I loved it because I drew some leaves twice the size to make it a bit more difficult and when they complained I was able to say (smugly) that I only said to look for the same shape, I didn’t say the same size and anyway I never said it would be easy (I always say this whilst laughing and they are always happy about it (once they’ve rolled their eyes) and set out determined to find the plant).

    We didn’t bother with plant names for that exercise unless the child asked; the idea was just to get them to notice leaf shapes in a fun way.

    I also so agree with Cate about teachers knowing very little about plants. In the UK this is improving a bit now because there is lots of advice and grants for schools to have vegetable plots and growing food has become a fashionable thing to do. Some schools now employ people (part time) to work with the children just on growing food in the school grounds.


    • on March 13, 2013 at 9:26 PM ArtPlantae Today

      Thanks, Martin. Now that sounds like a fun activity!


  5. on March 14, 2013 at 8:31 AM Darwin Jose

    Im a marine zoologist by training but spent a lot of time in tropical rainforests and karst forests getting kids (and elementary teachers) to think plants are amazing and cool. I agree with the proposals for more in school gardens (and more generally more interacting with living plants both in and outside the classroom). But fundamentally the challenge is how do we make the plants biggest ecological and evolutionary contributions understandable to kids, when we are talking about largely invisible processes (photosynthesis, respiration, transpiration, etc). The most important and basic aspects of these processes – that gas exchanges and the carbon fixation pieces, just don’t sink in. I’ve found that characterizing the gas parts in a funny (yet ecologically correct way) goes a long way in correcting common misconceptions and making it very cool to kids. My favorite one is to describe O2 as “plant poop” and discuss the entire process of accumulation of o2 in our atmosphere as “crap accumulating” on a massive scale, more crap than any living organism has ever released, forever altering the chemical composition of the atmosphere and allowing for the evolution of multicellular animals. Likewise we breath “plant poop” every time we breath. And the 02 helps us burn sugars more efficiently, etc.etc. Thinking of the o2 in photosynthesis as plant poop (you can use the terms excrement or waste or byproduct later, but poop or crap works best as it forces the kids to think of gases in a very different way and these are words they are familiar with and rarely used) dramatically alters the gut understanding of our relationship to plants – and makes photosynthesis (and plants) it funny and memorable to kids.


    • on March 22, 2013 at 3:59 PM Martin

      That’s brilliant! It makes me want to teach photosynthesis just so I can legitimately say “crap accumulating on a massive scale” with a straight face and mean it. I’m now thinking about how I can shoe-horn it into some botanical art teaching….
      Thank you for sharing!



Comments are closed.

  • I’m curious about…

  • What Readers Are Reading Now

    • California
    • Washington DC
    • Graphite Artist Writes About Techniques to Achieve Realism in Botanical Art
    • Anna Knights Creates Botanical Paintings with Captivating Detail
    • Florida
  • Plants & You

  • Featured Guests

    Wendy Hollender (interview)

    Wendy Hollender

    Gilly Shaeffer

    Today’s Botanical Artists

    Society of Botanical Artists

    Billy Showell (interview)

    Billy Showell

    Sarah Simblet (webinar)

    Robin Brickman

    Mark Granlund

    Wendy Hollender (webinar)

    Diane Cardaci

    Katie Lee (webinar)

    Bruce L. Cunningham (webinar)

    Jane LaFazio (interview)

    Jane LaFazio

    Mally Francis (interview)

    Kandis Elliot

    Anne-Marie Evans

    Margaret Best

    Elaine Searle

    Mindy Lighthipe

    Niki Simpson

    Anna (Knights) Mason

    Helen Allen

    Birmingham Society of
    Botanical Artists

    Hazel West-Sherring

    John Muir Laws

    Martin J. Allen

    Institute for Analytical Plant Illustration

    Mairi Gillies

    Georgius Everhardus Rumphius

    Liz Leech

    Valerie Littlewood

    Heeyoung Kim

    Anna Laurent

    Linda Ann Vorobik

    Shawn Sheehy

    Gary Hoyle

    Katie Zimmerman

    Mariella Baldwin

    Anita Walsmit Sachs

    Ruth Ava Lyons

    Katie Zimmerman

    Kellie Cox-Brady

    Jennifer Landin

    Laurence Hill

    Gretchen Kai Halpert

    Susan Leopold

    Tina Scopa

  • Global Impact

    Botanists and illustrators strive to document conifers around the world.

  • Nature Near You

    Global Directory of Botanical Gardens
    Botanic Gardens Conservation International
    Search for a Garden

    National Park Service
    Search for national parks at the National Park Service website.www.nps.gov

    National Environmental Education Foundation's Nature Center Guide.
    Find Your Nature Center

    Rails-to-Trails
    Find a trail for hiking, walking, cycling or inline skating. The Rails-to-Trails Conservancy and its volunteers work to convert unused railroads into trails for healthful outdoor activities.
    Search their national TrailLink database to locate a trail near you.

    Sierra Club Trails
    Locate trails for hiking, cycling, climbing, and many other outdoor activities.
    Search Sierra Club Trails

  • © 2007-2022 by Tania Marien. All rights reserved.
    Contact Tania

    Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. Artists retain the copyright to their work.

    The ArtPlantae® logo is a registered trademark.

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • ArtPlantae Today
    • Join 1,788 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • ArtPlantae Today
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: