• Home
  • About

ArtPlantae Today

Connecting artists, naturalists, and educators

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Botanical Artists MeetUp in Texas
Last Chance to Win ‘An Approach to Botanical Painting’ »

College Students’ Knowledge of Plants

October 19, 2012 by Tania Marien

We have seen how experiences in informal botany education can improve the plant recognition skills in children. Today we take a look at how plants fare in the minds of college students.

In Botanical Knowledge of a Group of College Students in South Carolina USA, Gail E. Wagner evaluates student knowledge of crop plants, trees, flowers, weeds, vines and grasses.

Wagner’s sample population consisted of thirty-one 18-22 year-old college students. Sixteen interviewers helped Wagner conduct this study. Each interviewed two students. The students who were interviewed were selected by the interviewers themselves. Both the interviewers and the interviewees were undergraduate students at the University of South Carolina. The interviewers were enrolled in an ethnobotany course.

During this study, students were asked to create a list of plants for each of the categories mentioned earlier. Wagner (2008) marked entries as being “correct”, “wrong”, or “inappropriate”. Incorrect entries were plants listed in the wrong categories or were listed using general terms. Entries marked “inappropriate” were entries that were placed in the correct category, but did not meet other criteria outlined by the interviewers (such as plants growing outside of South Carolina) (Wagner, 2008).

Student responses were entered into a software program used for consensus analysis (see Wagner’s paper for details). Data analysis revealed:

  • Students were more familiar with crops, trees and garden flowers than vines, weeds and grasses.
  • 77% of students could identify local crops correctly
  • 50% of students could list at least one wildflower or weed correctly (“dandelion” was listed most often)
  • 35% of students could not list a grass. One of the students surveyed remarked, “I didn’t know there were different kinds of grasses” (Wagner, 2008)
  • 19% of students could not list a vine
  • 4% of students could not list a wildflower or weed

Wagner (2008) found that students could provide the most detailed plant lists for categories with which they were most familiar. She explains she is not surprised by students’ ability to correctly identify more crops, trees and wildflowers given the well-established fact that children in industrialized countries interact with plants less frequently, are exposed to many non-native plant species through urbanized landscaping, and “that most local flora is viewed from the window of a vehicle” (Wagner, 2008).

Gail E. Wagner’s paper is much more than an analysis of botanical knowledge. It provides interesting insights into sources of knowledge and how people categorize information. Wagner (2008) provides an interesting discussion about “direct”, “indirect” and “vicarious” knowledge. Citing research about how children experience nature, she explains that indirect knowledge comes from direct interaction with plants, that indirect knowledge comes from guided interactions (such as what can be found at botanical gardens), and that vicarious knowledge is the kind of knowledge one might acquire while surfing the Web or watching television.

To learn more about these topics and Wagner’s thoughts about designing studies to evaluate botanical knowledge, download a copy of her article by clicking on the link below. The article is free to download. The journal Ethnobotany Research and Applications is published online. Its contents are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.


Literature Cited

  • Cooper, Chanda L. 2008. Botanical knowledge of a group of South Carolina elementary school students. Ethnobotany Research and Applications. 6: 121-127. Web.
    <http://lib-ojs3.lib.sfu.ca:8114/index.php/era/article/view/166>
    [accessed 28 September 2012]
  • Wagner, Gail E. 2008. Botanical knowledge of a group of college students in South Carolina, U.S.A. Ethnobotany Research and Applications. 6: 443-458. Web.
    <http://lib-ojs3.lib.sfu.ca:8114/index.php/era/article/view/196>
  •  [accessed 19 October 2012]

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in teaching & learning, Teaching & Learning |

  • I’m curious about…

  • What Readers Are Reading Now

    • California
    • Earn a Professional Certificate in Natural Science Illustration at the University of Washington
    • Scientific Illustration in the Elementary School Classroom
    • Today's Botanical Artists On Using Photographs
    • Dry Brush Technique for Botanical Artists
  • Plants & You

  • Featured Guests

    Wendy Hollender (interview)

    Wendy Hollender

    Gilly Shaeffer

    Today’s Botanical Artists

    Society of Botanical Artists

    Billy Showell (interview)

    Billy Showell

    Sarah Simblet (webinar)

    Robin Brickman

    Mark Granlund

    Wendy Hollender (webinar)

    Diane Cardaci

    Katie Lee (webinar)

    Bruce L. Cunningham (webinar)

    Jane LaFazio (interview)

    Jane LaFazio

    Mally Francis (interview)

    Kandis Elliot

    Anne-Marie Evans

    Margaret Best

    Elaine Searle

    Mindy Lighthipe

    Niki Simpson

    Anna (Knights) Mason

    Helen Allen

    Birmingham Society of
    Botanical Artists

    Hazel West-Sherring

    John Muir Laws

    Martin J. Allen

    Institute for Analytical Plant Illustration

    Mairi Gillies

    Georgius Everhardus Rumphius

    Liz Leech

    Valerie Littlewood

    Heeyoung Kim

    Anna Laurent

    Linda Ann Vorobik

    Shawn Sheehy

    Gary Hoyle

    Katie Zimmerman

    Mariella Baldwin

    Anita Walsmit Sachs

    Ruth Ava Lyons

    Katie Zimmerman

    Kellie Cox-Brady

    Jennifer Landin

    Laurence Hill

    Gretchen Kai Halpert

    Susan Leopold

    Tina Scopa

  • Global Impact

    Botanists and illustrators strive to document conifers around the world.

  • Nature Near You

    Global Directory of Botanical Gardens
    Botanic Gardens Conservation International
    Search for a Garden

    National Park Service
    Search for national parks at the National Park Service website.www.nps.gov

    National Environmental Education Foundation's Nature Center Guide.
    Find Your Nature Center

    Rails-to-Trails
    Find a trail for hiking, walking, cycling or inline skating. The Rails-to-Trails Conservancy and its volunteers work to convert unused railroads into trails for healthful outdoor activities.
    Search their national TrailLink database to locate a trail near you.

    Sierra Club Trails
    Locate trails for hiking, cycling, climbing, and many other outdoor activities.
    Search Sierra Club Trails

  • © 2007-2022 by Tania Marien. All rights reserved.
    Contact Tania

    Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. Artists retain the copyright to their work.

    The ArtPlantae® logo is a registered trademark.

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • ArtPlantae Today
    • Join 1,788 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • ArtPlantae Today
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: